A Learning Province: Public Engagement on Education Assessment in Ontario

What is the best way to support student learning? Parents, educators, and students—in Ontario and around the world—have debated this for decades. Learning is complex and evolving. We know that student assessment is an important part of the process. But how do we improve assessment and the reporting of it so that it has the most positive impact on student learning at individual, school, school board and system-wide levels? This is a provincial priority and the question we’d like to discuss with you today.

Our goal is to develop young people who become confident, capable, and caring citizens respectful of the diversity of Ontarians. People who appreciate, respect, value, and honour cultures, knowledge, and communities whether Indigenous or global in context, and who will thrive in their personal well-being. We will develop students’ knowledge, skills, and work habits so they become employable and economically self-sufficient.

  • Education of young people is a singularly important goal.
  • We will do what it takes to prepare young people for the challenges and opportunities that they face now and into the future.

How we got to now

In 1993 the Government of Ontario appointed the Royal Commission on Learning to study the direction of the province’s education system comprehensively. Its report provided extensive recommendations to improve the education system – and it emphasized the importance of classroom assessment in supporting students’ learning.

We are now looking ahead to imagine the future of assessments in Ontario. Reviewing how we approach assessment is necessary to realize the Ontario Ministry of Education’s commitment fully to meet the educational needs of Ontario’s young people.

Independent Review of Assessment and Reporting

On September 6, 2017, the Premier of Ontario, Kathleen Wynne, and Ontario’s Minister of Education, Mitzie Hunter, announced the establishment of an Independent Review of Assessment and Reporting to make sure educational assessments are culturally relevant, able to measure a wider range of learning, and better reflect equity and student well-being. They have asked a team of independent, expert advisors to review the current model of assessment and reporting practices.

Their study will engage as many viewpoints as possible in a province-wide conversation so the advisors can hear the hopes for, and concerns about, student assessment. This is essential if they are to make recommendations for improvement that will positively impact student experiences and outcomes.


Student assessment in Ontario

Ongoing classroom assessments JK-12
The diagram illustrates Ontario’s system of assessment and evaluation from junior kindergarten through to grade 12. Read from left to right, assessments commence at the senior kindergarten level with Early Development Instrument (EDI) evaluations on a three year cycle. In grades three, six, nine and ten Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) assessments are conducted on a yearly cycle. At the grade four level, the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) is conducted on a five year cycle. Evaluated at the grades four and eight levels is the Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) on a four year cycle. Grade eight students participate in the Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) on a three year assessment cycle. Last is the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) which is conducted at the grade ten level on a three year cycle. The EDI and EQAO assessments are census evaluations whereas the PIRLS, TIMSS, PCAP and PISA assessments involve a randomly selected sample of students for the evaluations.

Ontario’s system of assessment and evaluation works in multiple ways. For example, it supports student learning and it monitors and reports on student, school, school board, and provincial education performance. Also, there is a range of approaches to assessment: who participates, what is assessed, when assessments take place, how assessments are administered and how these things are reported and to whom.

There is also a difference between classroom assessments and large-scale assessments; both are important and useful and, taken together, paint a comprehensive picture of the learning and achievement of students.

Classroom assessments are developed by teachers to help individual students take their next steps in learning, and to inform students and their parents of the student’s achievement. This can take many forms, including teacher observations, student-teacher conversations, student in-class work, or homework that demonstrates their learning.

Large-scale assessments are one-time measures developed to provide snapshots of the strengths and weaknesses of education systems.

Familiar examples of large-scale assessments include:

Examples of National and International large-scale assessments include:

  • The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) is a national test administered every three years to assess Grade 8 students’ reading, mathematics, and science knowledge.
  • The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) reports every three years on the reading, math, and science literacy of Grade 10 students. Schools and students are selected randomly for participation.
  • Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) takes place every four years and measures the effectiveness of teaching and learning of mathematics and science for students in Grades 4 and 8. A sample of schools is selected at random to participate, and within each of those sampled schools, at least one student in each of Grade 4 and/or Grade 8 is selected to participate.
  • Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) is conducted every five years to measure learning in reading for Grade 4 students.

Both classroom and large-scale assessments need to be reevaluated and discussed. We believe that students’ experiences must be at the centre of those discussions and decisions about the future design and use of assessment.


Meeting the needs of all learners

Nurturing students as competent, capable, curious, and rich in potential throughout their schooling, from Kindergarten to grade 12, requires us to ensure assessment supports the learning of all children so each of Ontario’s young people may develop to their fullest potential.

However, there are systemic barriers within society that result in differential treatment, something that affects many students. These barriers must be removed.

Accommodating different cultures, different ways of knowing, differing teaching practices, and differing opportunities required to demonstrate learning must be built into the design of new forms of assessment and reporting.

What this means is that the assessment materials and practices we recommend must be culturally relevant, respectful, and appropriate to the diversity of Ontario’s communities and students, including Indigenous knowledge, languages, and cultures, Francophone identity and culture, special education needs, English/French language learners, and the experiences of racialized and minoritized groups.

This website is part of an independent review being conducted by the Education Advisors to the Premier of Ontario and Minister of Education.